Manual vs. Automated Testing: Benefits and Drawbacks of Each

Photo of author

Editorial Team

If you want to offer software that is of the highest quality, QA testing is a crucial stage that cannot be skipped. By going through this procedure, you may find any inefficiencies in your product and ensure that it is of the highest caliber before releasing it into the market. The selection between manual and automated testing methods is contingent upon several aspects, including financial constraints, project specifications, timeliness, and more.

You may read about the main distinctions between automated and manual testing in our post. And you may choose the one that best suits your company’s objectives. Hurry up and read!

What Does the Term “Manual Testing” Actually Mean?

To put it briefly, since they spend hundreds of hours using goods, devoted manual testers have a more intuitive understanding of how a piece of software feels to the user. Their ability to test the user experience of a product is improved by this command. This assertion holds, at least in the case of the conventional automated testing frameworks that QA software testing services often use. 


  • Quick and precise feedback;
  • Human intuition and judgment are quite helpful in this process;
  • Coding would be necessary for the automated test, which would take time when testing a simple change.


  • Is done by a person, hence mistakes, omissions, and errors are possible;
  • It is not possible to record or capture manual testing since it is not reusable;
  • Some activities demand more testing time because they are difficult to do manually;
  • Even when repeating the same testing situation, it takes a long time.

What Does the Term “Automatic Testing” Actually Mean?

Automated testing is the process by which testing instruments repeat predetermined activities and compare the anticipated and actual results of developing software. If the goals and expectations of the program line up, your project is probably bug-free and operating as it should. But if the two are out of alignment, something is wrong and has to be fixed. You’ll need to review your code, make any necessary changes, and keep running tests until the anticipated and actual results line up.


  • Detect flaws sooner;
  • Get rid of human mistakes since automation ensures consistent quality;
  • Since automation has no boundaries, testing may run continuously;
  • Reusable test for often updated code;
  • Without making any mistakes, compare millions of lines of conversion data.


  • Expensive since the test has to be set because it is project-specific;
  • Not useful for little or temporary undertakings;
  • Eliminate any space for creativity and experimental research;
  • Maybe the cause of crashes as scalability problems worsen.

The Principal Distinctions Between Automated and Manual Testing

Numerous testing techniques, including functional, load, integration, system, performance, and others, employ both automated and manual testing. However, some of them are better suited for manual testing, while automation may be used for the others. We have carefully selected several instances where each of these test kinds is applicable to highlight the key distinctions between automated and manual testing.

When is Manual Testing Often Used?

  • You are working on a short-term, low-budget project;
  • You must finish the exploratory testing;
  • You will do impromptu testing, which is often unplanned, and obtaining testing insights is crucial to this procedure;
  • You should assess the value of the app’s user experience for your end users and test the usability of the app.

When is Automation Testing Appropriate?

  • For your project, you are aware of a certain number of regression tests;
  • It is recommended to do load and stress testing on server models and web servers;
  • You need to test several software capabilities for a large project;
  • Regression testing must be performed several times;
  • To verify features of software quality like scalability, dependability, and speed, you do performance testing.


When it comes to testing throughout the development process, there is no magic bullet. We are unable to depend on a single strategy, even with the abundance of testing methods and resources available. Both manual and automated testing have advantages and disadvantages. We want to emphasize that you cannot automate everything, regardless of how good automated tests are. In software development, manual testing is crucial and useful when automation is not an option.